- Datacon 2200 evo plus issues full#
- Datacon 2200 evo plus issues pro#
- Datacon 2200 evo plus issues Pc#
- Datacon 2200 evo plus issues professional#
personally I would never get the A2000, because here is no gain over similar products, the speed is not that super to sacrifice the TBW for itOf course the A2000 could fail before, but then again, does that matter? Again, this is just warranted endurance we’re talking about. Nofanneeded said:What you said about the Phison mite not last 1600 TBW as the say CAN BE ALSO SAID ABOUT the Kingston a2000, who knows that it will even last 600TBS ? you can only say that when you test the TBW (which is almost impossible at Tomshardware)Īnd again this is not fair fr readers who dont know about the 3X TBW drives and trust your review. personally I would never get the A2000, because here is no gain over similar products, the speed is not that super to sacrifice the TBW for it Īnd again this is not fair fr readers who dont know about the 3X TBW drives and trust your review.
Datacon 2200 evo plus issues pro#
so you cant give a "pro" comapred to a "con" just because Samsung is faster.Īnd again, I dont care anout averag use of TBW, when the technology reaches 3X the TBW, you cant give a pro for 1X.
Yes Samsung is super fast, but one of Samsung cons is low TBW. Matching Samsung has nothing to do with it, Samsung are not known for good endurance. What you said about the Phison mite not last 1600 TBW as the say CAN BE ALSO SAID ABOUT the Kingston a2000, who knows that it will even last 600TBS ? you can only say that when you test the TBW (which is almost impossible at Tomshardware) It's not class-leading, but it's respectable none the less. Seanwebster said:Sure, Phison E12 and E16 based SSDs have 3x the rated endurance, of this, but who knows, will they all actually last as long as stated? Will they last longer? Matching the Samsung 970 EVO and WD Black SN750's endurance values as an entry-level NVMe SSD at a fraction of the price, I'd say that's a Pro for the drive.
But, for the average user, it's much more than enough. If one is planning on bombarding their drives with writes, then, of course, one would turn to purchase a product of higher endurance. Much higher than the QLC SSDs hitting the market too.
Datacon 2200 evo plus issues professional#
Unless it is going to be used in a professional workflow, I fail to see where 600 TB of write endurance is less than adequate for most consumers.
Not fair for ther product and not fair for the other products.Sure, Phison E12 and E16 based SSDs have 3x the rated endurance, of this, but who knows, will they all actually last as long as stated? Will they last longer? Matching the Samsung 970 EVO and WD Black SN750's endurance values as an entry-level NVMe SSD at a fraction of the price, I'd say that's a Pro for the drive. if this 600TBW is respectable then what will you call 1600TBW and the same price and speed ? it is almost 3X. Nofanneeded said:it is not about me, it is about the review itself, the NVME SSD I put there are at the same price range and it is not fair for them that you put on inferior TBW product a Pro. because you never tested any TBW to be sure who is lying and who is not. Not fair for ther product and not fair for the other products.Īs for some mnufacturer cheat in the TBW numbers, well this can be said for the Reviewd 600TBW SSD as well. It is not about me, it is about the review itself, the NVME SSD I put there are at the same price range and it is not fair for them that you put on inferior TBW product a Pro.
Datacon 2200 evo plus issues full#
Does Crystal Disk Info report full link speed? Got enough free space? Did you just clone or migrate all your data to the drive? if so, you may just need to envoke Windows Optimize/Trim and let it have some idle time, maybe leave it on overnight, to recover. Hmm, could have some configuration issues. That gives it about a 30-year life span when it comes to writing endurance alone if the real-world endurance result actually matches the rating.
Datacon 2200 evo plus issues Pc#
And, they match high-end drives like the Samsung 970 EVO Plus and WD Black SN750.Īs well, how much endurance actually matters? What is your workload? Do you know how much PC users write to their drives on average? It's 5-10TB a year, at most 20TB, usually with write amplification from what I've gathered.Ĭonsidering 600TB is 6x more than a high-average (100TB) of writes over 5-years, I'd say its respectable. They don't necessarily correspond to actual product endurance. Seanwebster said:The thing is, these are warranted endurance ratings. If you need a larger drive, you should look into the KC2000 as an alternative. Kingston’s A2000 is available in mainstream capacities that stretch from 250GB up to 1TB.
0 kommentar(er)
